New foreign ownership caps in Vietnamese banks

Decree 1/2014 introduces new regulations on foreign investment in Vietnamese banks and finance companies which will take effect from 20 February 2014 replacing Decree 69/2007. The most important change is the change in the applicable foreign ownership caps:

 

Decree 1/2014

Decree 69/2007

One foreign individual investor

5%

5%

One foreign individual investor and his/her related persons

20%

5%

One non-strategic institutional investor

15%

5% for non-financial institutions

10% for financial institutions

One non-strategic foreign institutional investor and its related persons

20%

5% for non-financial institutions

10% for financial institutions

One foreign strategic investor and its related persons

20%

15% in normal case

20% if approved by the Prime Minister

All foreign investors

30%

30%

Exception

A credit institution with financial difficulty can exceed the foreign ownership caps if permitted by the Prime Minister

No

 

 

Vietnam Business Law Blog

On 23 June 2023, the National Assembly adopted the new Law on Tendering effective from 1 January 2024 (Law on Tendering 2023). In an effort to foster a more competitive market, the Law on Tendering 2023 introduces significant amendments regarding the scope of application, methods, and procedures for selecting tenderers and investors. This post will summarize some notable changes in the Law on Tendering 2023.

1)         Amendments to the scope of application

Under both the Law on Tendering 2023 and the old Law on Tendering 2013, the selection of investors for (1) projects using land in accordance with the law on land, and (2) other projects in accordance with specific laws must comply with the tendering procedures.  The Law on Tendering 2023 provides for certain changes relating to such cases.

Regarding projects using land, the above requirement appears to refer to the circumstances of land allocation and land rental via tender procedure as set forth in the new Land Law effective from 1 January 2025 (Land Law 2024). Under the Land Law 2024, the provincial People’s Council must decide to allow a project  using land to be tendered. This condition is not provided in the Land Law 2013 and the Law on Tendering 2013.

With respect to other projects in accordance with specific laws, under Decree 23/2024 implementing the Law on Tendering 2023, the Government specifies projects subject to tendering under specific laws. Such projects include, for example, investment projects for the renovation and reconstruction of apartment buildings, or investment projects for the construction of domestic solid waste treatment works. Previously, the Law on Tendering 2013 did not provide for further clarification on this issue.  

From February 2024, companies and foreign investors applying for a contribution of capital or purchase of share/capital contribution by the foreign investor (M&A Approval) must state the actual price of proposed transfer, instead of the estimated transfer price as previously. This is one critical change in the new template for the application for an M&A Approval under Circular 25/2023 of Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI).

The change may have an adverse effect on relevant parties, especially the foreign investor, particularly:

  • The parties of an M&A transaction may find it difficult to declare an “actual transfer price” since the M&A Approval will be issued well in advance of the closing of the transaction.

In a shareholder agreement (or joint venture agreement) between members of a multiple member limited liability companies (Multiple LLC), the members often agree on various transfer restrictions such as right of first offer (ROFO), right of first refusal (ROFR), tag along or drag along rights. These transfers are intended for the parties to control the ownership structure of the Multiple LLC and their exit from the Multiple LLC. However, implementing such agreements on transfer restriction may be inconsistent with the statutory transfer restrictions provided in Article 52 of the Enterprise Law 2020. Therefore, a shareholder agreement relating to a Multiple LLC should have specific provision to resolve such inconsistencies.

The table below sets out the potential inconsistencies between agreements on ROFO, ROFR, Tag Along and Drag Along and the transfer procedures under Article 52 of the Enterprise Law 2020.

Please download the pdf version here.

In this post, we continue discussing the new changes introduced by the Real Estate Business Law 2023. Part 1 of our discussion can be found Here.

This post is written by Nguyen Hoang Duong and Nguyen Bich Ngọc, and edited by Nguyen Quang Vu.

1)         New restriction when collecting deposit for purchase of off-plan real estate

Under the Real Estate Business Law 2023, real estate developers can only collect a deposit of up to 5% of sale price of the relevant real estate from purchasers when the residential houses, construction works are qualified to be put into trading. The law further requires a deposit agreement to expressly set out the sale price and area of the off-plan real estate. The off-plan real estate under the deposit agreement must satisfy conditions for sale under law. This indicates that collecting a deposit is considered putting relevant off-plan real estate into business.

The new requirements may pose significant difficulty for real estate developers with weak financial capacity when it comes to funding for pre-construction phase of their projects.

Introduction

On 18 January 2024, new Law on Credit Institutions (LCI 2024) has been passed by the National Assembly. LCI 2024 will replace the Law on Credit Institutions 2010 (as amended) (LCI 2010) from 1 July 2024. In a series of posts, we will introduce the new changes of LCI 2024.

It seems that the ongoing criminal case against the controlling shareholders of Saigon Commercial Bank (SCB) has motivated the draftsman of LCI 2024 to introduce stricter management toward credit institutions (CIs).

Stricter conditions of independent board members

LCI 2024 tightens the standards and conditions of independent members of the Board of Directors of CIs. Specifically, an independent member of the Board of Directors of a CI must not represent ownership of any share of such CI and not, together with his/her related persons, directly or indirectly own 1% or more of the charter capital of such CI.

A broader range of related persons

LCI 2024 expands the definition of related persons to also cover the relationship between (i) the “grandparent” company/CIs and the “grandchildren” company, (ii) the manager/controller of a parent company/CIs and the subsidiary, and (iii) an individual with his/her wider range of family members.

On 22 June 2023, the National Assembly passed a new Law on E-transactions, set to be effect from 1 July 2024 (LET 2023). The LET 2023 introduces significant changes regarding the use of e-signatures by individuals as outlined below:

1)         Restriction on individuals’ right to create and use of their own e-signature

The LET 2023 categorizes e-signatures into three types as below, none of which encompass e-signatures self-generated by individuals:

  • specialized e-signatures (chữ ký điện tử chuyên dùng), which are created and used by organizations for their “own private operations” in accordance with their function and tasks;

  • public digital signature (chữ ký số công cộng), which are used for “public activities” and are secured by an e-certificate confirming the public digital signature issued by a qualified service provider; and

  • specialized digital signature for official use (chữ ký số chuyên dùng công vụ), which are digital signatures used for official activities and are secured by an e-certificate confirming the specialized digital signature for official use issued by a qualified service provider

Unlike the broader definition of e-signatures under the LET 2005, which may cover signatures self-created by individuals, this classification significantly limits individuals' ability to create and use their own e-signatures. Under the LET 2023, individuals may be required to use a public digital signature issued by a third-party service provider in normal e-transactions.

Under the Law on Bankruptcy 2014, creditors (chủ nợ) of a bankrupt enterprise include unsecured creditors, partially secured creditors (chủ nợ có bảo đảm một phần) and secured creditors (chủ nợ có bảo đảm). While it is not entirely clear, it appears that partially secured creditors are considered as a separate class of creditors and have their own rights during a bankruptcy proceeding.

Under the Law on Bankruptcy 2014,

  • a secured creditor is defined as a creditor having the right to require the relevant bankrupt enterprise to perform an obligation to repay a secured debt with the assets of the enterprise or a third party; and

  • a partially secured creditor is defined as a creditor having the right to require the relevant bankrupt enterprise to perform an obligation to repay a secured debt with the assets of the enterprise or a third party “where the value of such assets is less than that debt”.

The definition of a secured creditor does not clearly refer to “fully secured creditors” since it does not require the value of the secured assets is equal or more than the debt owed to a secured creditor. Accordingly, technically, the term “secured creditor” could cover both partially secured creditor and fully secured creditor. That said, a more in-depth reading of the Bankruptcy Law 2014 suggests that partially secured creditors are treated as a separate class of creditors. However, it is not clear whether this distinction is created by design or by chance by the draftsman of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.

From January 2021, under the Enterprise Law 2020, if a member of the board of directors (the Board) hands in his/her letter of resignation to resign as a Board member in a joint stock company (JSC), he/she may not cease to be a Board Member until approved so by the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) of the relevant JSC. To mitigate the potential issues arising from this provision, a JSC may consider providing that the GMS must dismiss a Board member when he/she tenders his/her resignation. In addition, the resigning Board Member should give authorisation to another appropriate person until he/she is officially dismissed.

After incorporating a joint stock company (JSC), the founding shareholders of the JSC will typically have 90 days from the issuance of the enterprise registration certificate (Capital Contribution Period) to pay for the shares they have subscribed as at the incorporation of the JSC (Subscription Shares). Under the Enterprise Law 2020, it is reasonable to consider that during the Capital Contribution Period, the founding shareholders who have not paid for the Subscription Shares in full would have all the shareholders rights including rights to transfer the Shares which have not been paid up. However, the drafting of the Enterprise Law 2020 could give rise to the position that during the Capital Contribution Period shareholder rights, the founding shareholders have only the voting right.

Introduction

As detailed in a prior post, in our opinion, representations and warranties (warranties) should constitute obligations of the person giving it under Vietnamese law. They could imply an obligation on the part of the person providing them (Warrantor) to guarantee that the stated facts and matters are true. In this post, we will try to examine the consequences of breaches of representations and warranties under Vietnamese law. As discussed further below, depending on the context, a breach of warranties might give rise to:

·        liabilities for breach of warranties as independent obligations; or

·        liabilities for breach of obligations to deliver conforming goods; or

·        liabilities for breach of obligations to provide information to contracting parties; or

·        indemnity (or reimbursement) of losses to the extent the parties have agreed for an indemnity (or reimbursement) of losses arising from a breach of warranties.

Given that “representations and warranties” are exclusively common law concepts and no specific legal framework for them is provided under Vietnamese law, it is important that Vietnamese law contracts should have provisions dealing with the above in order to achieve the intended outcome of the parties.

Based on the discussion below, probably, the preferable approach is to have specific wording in the share sale and purchase agreement that warranties form part of the description and quality of the sale shares so that, among other things, seller could be subject to the remedies applicable to breach of obligation to deliver non-conforming goods.

Please download the pdf version here.

After a quite lengthy debate and discussion, on 28 November 2023, the National Assembly officially adopted a new law on real estate business (Real Estate Business Law 2023). The Real Estate Business Law 2023 is expected to enhance the real estate business environment and resolve some long-standing legal issues. However, the new Real Estate Business Law 2023 will have to wait until 1 January 2025 to take effect. The deferred effectiveness of the Real Estate Business Law 2023 is probably intended to give the National Assembly more time to promulgate the new land law, which to some extent could be considered as the “foundation” for formulating the Real Estate Business Law 2023.

Representations and warranties constitute an important building block in a contract. Unfortunately, Vietnamese contract law does not have a separate regime on representations and warranties. Accordingly, this gives rise to various questions concerning representations and warranties under Vietnamese law. The first question would be whether representations and warranties are considered as obligations of the person giving it.

In a book on Vietnam contract law, the author, a well-known business lawyer, considers that representations and warranties are statements of facts and are not undertaking to perform or not perform a specific task. Therefore, representations and warranties are not obligations under Vietnamese law. We have a different view on this.

At law, enterprises engaging in certain special business lines (e.g. labour outsourcing service, employment services, etc.) (Security Deposit Enterprise) are required to place a security deposit at a licensed bank in Vietnam (Custodian Bank) before conducting the relevant businesses (Security Deposit). The Security Deposit is subject to strict control regulations (e.g. it can only be withdrawn or released in specific cases upon being approved by a competent authority). While the term of the Security Deposit could be long (e.g. more than one year), it is not entirely clear from the law whether the Custodian Bank can establish the Security Deposit as a term deposit and apply the respective interest rate.

Owners of apartments in an apartment building in Vietnam must set aside 2% of the purchase price for contribution into the apartment building’s maintenance fund (Quỹ bảo trì) and pay monthly contribution into the apartment building’s operation fund (Quỹ vận hành). The management of an apartment buildings including the maintenance fund and the operation fund will be handled by (1) “the meeting of [owners of] the apartment building”(hội nghị nhà chung cư) (building owner meeting) (2) a building management board selected by the building owner meeting, and (3) a management company selected by the meeting of owners of the apartment building.

Vietnamese law provides for a relatively detailed framework on management of an apartment building. However, several important issues, which are discussed below, are still not adequately addressed:

  • The residential housing regulations seem to require an apartment building to be managed by a single management company. However, an apartment building usually includes certain commercial components such as office or shopping mall which are managed and operated very differently (e.g., the lifts serving commercial section will be used more extensively that those used for residential section). Accordingly, the combination of management of both residential section and commercial section in one single mechanism could cause conflicts between the apartment owners and the owners of the commercial section.

On 18 September 2023, the Government issued Decree 70 (Decree 70/2023) to amend various regulations on management of foreign employees under current Decree 152/2020. Decree 70/2023 took effect immediately upon its issuance. Below is our discussion on notable changes introduced under Decree 70/2023.

1)         Easing requirements for engagement of foreign employees

  • Under Decree 70/2023, a foreign employee is no longer required to have educational background to be relevant to his/her work experience and proposed job in Vietnam. Instead, the law now only requires the employee to have a minimum work experience suitable for the proposed jobs;

  • Decree 70/2023 now expands the type of documents that can be used to demonstrate educational background and work experience of foreign employees being expert and technician. In particular, previous work permits or exemption certificates can also be used as evidence for foreign employee’s experience; and

  • A foreign employees now can use passport copy which has been certified by their Vietnam-based employer to apply for work permit or renew its work permit, this would facilitate employees’ application for work permits from abroad. Previously, the employees had to provide their original passport for notarization in Vietnam.

n 24 April 2023, the Justices of the Supreme Court of Vietnam (the Supreme Court) hosted an online seminar to tackle some issues that arise in the courts’ trial practice. Official Letter no. 196/TANDTC-PC issued by the Supreme Court on 3 October 2023 (the Official Letter) documents the results from the online seminar in April. The Official Letter contains mainly the clarification and interpretation of the Supreme Court of the existing legal provisions across various areas of law, including penal, civil, commercial, and administrative. Although these clarification and interpretation are non-binding, they constitute an important source of interpretation for the court system to rely on.

In this post, we will discuss some clarifications from the Official Letter that we find interesting or noteworthy:

1)         The subjects capable of committing the crime of “Intentional public disclosure of false information or concealment of information in securities activities” (Article 209 of the Penal Code 2015) are the natural persons or commercial legal persons responsible for public disclosure of information regarding securities, and not the parties to a securities transfer transaction.

Our comments:

The clarification for the Supreme Court is not clear since under the securities regulations, sometimes parties to a securities transaction must make public disclosure about the transaction (e.g., sale or purchase of shares by a major/inside shareholder). So it appears that this crime only applies to a person who violate the disclosure obligations under securities regulations but not to a person who fails to disclosure information under its contractual obligations.

On 8 November 2023, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Official Letter 8631 to publish answers to certain questions on lending regulations under Circular 6/2023 of the SBV dated 28 June 2023 (Circular 6/2023) amending Circular 39/2016 of the SBV dated 30 December 2016 on lending activities of credit institutions (CIs) and/or foreign bank branches with customers (Circular 39/2016).

The table below will highlight some notable answers of the SBV.

In practice, annually, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) allocates annual credit growth limits to each credit institution including the finance company. However, the SBV’s allocation for each credit institution is not publicly available. Each credit institution will be subject to different credit growth limits. Based on newspaper reports, it appears the SBV takes into account the financial status of each credit institution, targeted inflation rate and targeted GDP growth rate to make the decision. In September 2022, it was reported that the SBV should use its ranking system to decide to allocate credit growth limits to each credit institution.

The planned credit growth limit for a year can be adjusted by the SBV during that year based on the assessment of the operation status and liquidity of each credit institution, as well as other development policies.

Decree 13/2023 on Personal Data Protection (PDPD) has stirred a lot of excitement among legal professionals in Vietnam. Recently, such excitement met with the cold hard realities of the difficulties in fulfilling even the basic administrative procedures under PDPD. In particular, in July 2023, the Ministry of Public Security (MPS)  published the required contents of the file for assessment of the impact of personal data processing and the file for assessment of the impact of offshore transferring personal data. The levels of details and analysis required to prepare these files are very demanding. For example, the MPS require these files to include the following information and documents:

You must select a collection to display.