Decree 10/2020 and ride-hailing platforms in Vietnam

On 17 January 2020, the Government issued a new Decree (Decree 10/2020) to replace Decree 86 dated 10 September 2014 (Decree 86/2014) regulating road transportation services by cars. This new Decree introduces updated regulations to govern a growing number of ride-hailing platforms in Vietnam (or at least the parts of such platforms associated with automobile transportation).

Previously, Grab Company Limited (Grab VN) is permitted by the Ministry of Transportation to act as an intermediary connecting automobile transport business entities and passengers to provide its automobile ride-hailing platform (i.e., GrabCar). With the new Decree 10/2020, if Grab VN (and other entities conducting similar business) directly manages vehicles or chauffeurs, or determines the transport fare, they would be considered as conducting transportation by automobile business instead as “conducting business of transport by automobile” (kinh doanh vận tải bằng xe ô tô) is defined as: the act of performing at least one of the main steps of transport activities (being directly managing vehicles and chauffeurs, or determining the transport fare) in order to transport passenger or goods on road for profit.

THE LAW ON ANTI HARMFUL EFFECT OF ALCOHOL 2019

For the first time, the Law on Prevention and Control of Harmful Effects of Alcohol Beverages (Law on Anti Alcohol 2019) was adopted by the National Assembly on 15 June 2019. Law on Anti Alcohol 2019 will take effect from 1 January 2020. Below are summaries of certain key issues of this:

·        The Law on Anti Alcohol 2019 provides new definition of spirit and beer; Accordingly, the scope of spirit in Law on Anti Alcohol 2019 is wider than that of Decree 105/2017 and includes spirits of less than 5% ABV;

·        Driving with alcoholic content in the blood or breath is prohibited regarless of the quantity of alcoholic content in the blood or breath;

·        Sales promotion of spirit and beer having 15% and more ABV are prohibited. However, it should be noted that under Decree 81/2018, promotion of all  spirits are prohibited regardless of its ABV level;

Rules of origin for goods manufactured in Vietnam market

In recent years, there have been various cases where manufacturers of goods using imported components in Vietnam are held to have violated the rules of origin when using the phrase “Made in Vietnam” (e.g., Asanzo, KhaiSilk, and Seven.am). Therefore, it is important to understand the rules of origin applicable for goods sold in Vietnam market. In this post, we will discuss the rules of origin under Vietnam domestic law and the rules of origin under the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA).

The rules of origin applicable to imported and exported goods between ASEAN countries (including Vietnam) (ASEAN Goods) are provided under ATIGA. Whereas, under Vietnamese laws, there is no legal framework for determining the origin of goods manufactured and sold within Vietnam territory (Vietnam Domestic Goods). In particular, it is not clear which conditions or standards Vietnam Domestic Goods must satisfy so that they can be labelled “products of Vietnam”, “made in Vietnam” or the like.

According to Article 2(d) and Article 3(c) of WTO’s Agreement on Rules of Origin, WTO members must ensure that the rules of origin that they apply to imports and exports are no more stringent than the rules of origin they apply to determine whether or not a good is domestic. This means that Vietnam Domestic Goods are always subject to equal or more stringent rules of origin than those applicable to imports and exports (currently provided in Decree 31 of the Government dated 8 March 2018 detailing the Law on Foreign Trade Management on product origin (Decree 31/2018)).

New Decree on Vietnam Competition Law Sanctions

In September 2019, the Government issued new Decree 75/2019 providing administrative sanctions regarding violation of the Vietnam new competition law. Decree 75/2019 details violation in competition including violation of (a) competition-restricting agreements, (b) abuse of a dominant market position or monopoly position; (c) economic concentration; and (d) unfair competitive practices. Set out below are some notable changes in Decree 75/2019: