Factors affecting an acquisition of companies in Vietnam

Any acquisition will have its own details and structures. That being said, a foreign investor intending to do deal in Vietnam should take into account the following factors, among other things:

Corporate form of the target company

A target company in Vietnam may be:

  1. a limited liability company (LLC) (công ty trách nhiệm hữu hạn) incorporated under the Enterprise Law. A LLC may be a single-member LLC (One Member LLC), which is owned by a single member, or a two or more members LLC (Multiple Member LLC), which is owned by two or more members; or
  2. a joint stock company (JSC) (công ty cổ phần) incorporated under the Enterprise Law. A JSC can be a public JSC (which usually has 100 or more shareholders) or a private JSC. A public JSC may also be a “listed company” (công ty niêm yết) if the shares of the relevant company is listed on a stock exchange.

The corporate form of the target company may affect a transaction significantly. For example, a foreign investor may not be able to acquire more than 49% of a public JSC while it can acquire 100% of a LLC doing the same business. The selling shareholders in a public JSC can be subject to substantially lower capital gain tax than the selling shareholders in a private JSC.

Nature of the existing owner(s) of the target company:

A target company in Vietnam may be owned and controlled by:

  1. local private investors, in which case the target company is considered as a domestic company. Investing in a domestic company may or may not require an Investment Certificate;   
  2. foreign investor, in which case the target company is considered as a foreign invested enterprise. A foreign invested company incorporated on or after 1 July 2006 should operate either as a LLC or JSC under the Enterprise Law. However, a foreign invested company which was incorporated before 1 July 2006 and has not re-registered as a LLC under the Enterprise Law will operate in a legal vacuum and be subject to many uncertainties. Investing in a foreign invested company is usually subject to an Investment Certificate; or
  3. Vietnamese Government, in which case the target company is considered as a State-owned enterprise. Investing in a State-owned enterprise may be subject to separate rules on equitisation (or privatisation) of State-owned enterprises.

Nature of the business of the target company

Depending on the business of the target company, there may be specific restrictions on foreign investment or other special requirements applicable to the proposed acquisition or the target company.

Vietnam Business Law Blog

On 3 September 2025, the Ministry of Finance (MOF) released the Official Letter no. 13629 addressing questions related to difficulties and obstacles arising from legal regulations in the finance and investment sector. This correspondence has several notable issues that are summarized below. While some of the MOF’s guidance offers welcome flexibility and operational reassurance, others fall short of providing clear or comprehensive clarification, leaving important gaps unresolved and inconsistencies with other legislation unaddressed.

Delegation by the General Meeting of Shareholders endorsed in principle (Query no. 29)

Query/Issue raised:

Current regulations regarding delegation/authorisation (both could be translated to/from "uỷ quyền" in Vietnamese) by the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) to the Board are unclear and conflicting. […]

A recurring issue in Vietnam corporate governance is whether a former member of the Board of Directors can be appointed as an “independent” Board member in the subsequent term, provided that all other statutory criteria are satisfied. This typically arises where companies want to retain a former board member while still complying with independence requirements under Article 155.2 of the Enterprises Law 2020 as amended in 2025 (Enterprises Law 2020).

Under Article 155.2(dd) of Enterprises Law 2020, an independent Board member must “not hold the position of member of the Board of the company within the last 05 years or longer unless he/she was designated in 02 consecutive terms.

Vietnamese law currently lacks a formal definition of “latent defect” (khiếm khuyết ẩn) and a clear mechanism for allocating liability once such defects arise. This regulatory vacuum often leads to prolonged disputes between the Employer and the Contractor, particularly when the construction contracts do not include explicit risk allocation.

For the purpose of our discussion below, a “latent defect” is defined as a fault or flaw in construction works/item that is not discoverable through a reasonably thorough inspection at the time of handover.

When companies think about data protection, they usually focus on “visible” data like names, email addresses, or bank details. However, there is a hidden layer called metadata - essentially “data about data” - that often gets ignored.

Under Vietnam’s new personal data protection rules, overlooking metadata is a major risk. If metadata can be used to identify a specific person, it falls under the same strict rules as regular personal data.

What is Metadata? The “Digital Footprint”

Metadata is information that describes the context of a file or a message rather than the content itself. Even if you remove a person’s name from a file, the metadata can still point directly to them.

Vietnam is currently at a pivotal stage of infrastructure modernization. To meet the immense demand for capital, the State has moved to revitalize private sector participation, most notably through the “Build – Transfer” (BT) model.

In a typical BT arrangement, a private investor finances and constructs an infrastructure project, then transfers it to the State upon completion. In return, the State “pays” the investor with land funds, allowing them to develop a “reciprocal project” (dự án đối ứng) to recover their capital and generate profit. While this mechanism is essential to stimulate private sector participation, the recent new legal framework for BT projects may raise significant concern regarding the land access privileges granted to BT investors compared to their counterparts in the general real estate market. In particular,

Foreign ownership limit in a public-turned-private shareholding company.


Under the new Decree 58/2012, a company, which ceases to be a public company, will still be subject to the restrictions applicable to a public company for a period of one year after the date on which it is no longer a public company. This effectively means that a public-turned-private shareholding company is still subject to the 49% foreign ownership limit applicable to public companies for a period of one year after ceasing being a public company.

However, the restriction under the new Decree 58/2012 does not apply if the relevant company is turned private due to “consolidation, merger, bankruptcy, dissolution, change of form of enterprise or acquisition by another entity”. Among these exceptions, the “change of form of an enterprise” seems to be easier to implement. Under the Enterprise Law, a shareholding company can change its corporate form by turning it into a limited liability company. However, this will likely require the public shareholding company to reduce its number of shareholders from more than 100 to 50 or less. 

Certain Limitations on Privately Issued Shares



Under the controversial Decree 1/2010,  a private placement of shares in a private shareholding company was subject to various restrictions under Decree 1/2010, including:
  • shares privately issued were subject to a lock-up period of 1 year;
  • there had to be a six-month gap between two tranches of a private placement; and
  • the proceeds resulting from the sale of shares had to be kept in an escrow account.


Decree 58/2012 of the Government dated 20 July 2012 implementing the Securities Law has repealed Decree 1/2010 and therefore has removed these restrictions. However, except in certain limited circumstances, private placement of shares by a public shareholding company is still subject to the first two restrictions, which are provided in the amended Securities Law rather than in Decree 1/2010.

Summary of the equitisation process of a Vietnamese State-owned Enterprise


Below is a quick summary of the process to equities a wholly State-owned enterprise (SOE) in Vietnam. The summary is taken from my book “Equitisation of Vietnamese State-owned Enterprises”, which is currently available in the Amazon Kindle Store. I will make this book available for free download on 15 December 2012. Anyone interested in the book should open an Amazon account (credit card is required) and download it. Kindle books can be read by Amazon Kindle e-reader or free Kindle reading apps on  smartphones, tablets, web browser,  PC or Mac computers.
  
·         Definition: Generally, equitisation is the process of privatising an SOE (the Equitised SOE) by (1) setting up a new joint stock company (the Equitised JSC), (2) transferring assets and liabilities of the Equitised SOE to the Equitised JSC and (3) selling shares in the to-be-established Equitised JSC to private sectors in the meantime.

·         Authorities involved: Various Government authorities will be involved in the equitisation of an Equitised SOE, including (1) the Equitisation Authority, who decides the most important issues relating to the equitisation, (2) the Valuation Authority, who determines the valuation of the Equitised SOE, and (3) the Steering Committee, who is in charge of the day-to-day operation. The law does not clearly provide powers and responsibilities of Government authorities with respect to an equitisation, as such, it may sometimes be difficult to determine the powers or even identity the Government authorities involved in the equitisation.

·         Investors: Investors purchasing shares during the equitisation of an Equitised SOE may be classified as (1) Vietnamese or foreign investors; (2) Strategic Investors or Non-strategic Investors; or (3) employees of the Equitised SOE and “outside” investors.

·         Preparation for sale of shares: During this step, various preparatory tasks need to be completed to commence the equitation and to prepare for next steps. This step includes (1) establishment of the Steering Committee, (2) appointment of Equitisation Advisors, and (3) collection of information and documents regarding the Equitised SOE.

·         Valuation of the Equitised SOE:  During this step, the Equitised SOE must (1) take an inventory of its assets and liabilities, (2) restructure its assets and liabilities and (3) determine the value of the Equitised SOE. Through the restructuring of assets and liabilities, the Equitisation Authority and the Equitised SOE will do their homework in shaping and, potentially, cleaning up the balance sheet of the Equitised JSC and, to the extent possible, resolving any past issues or mistakes before making the Equitised SOE available to the public. The Equitised SOE can be valued by the following valuation methods: assets method, discounted cash flow method or other valuation method. However, the valuation result obtained from the assets method is the minimum threshold. The valuation of a Special SOE may need to be verified by the State Auditor.

·         Equitisation Plan: Based on the valuation result, the Equitised SOE will prepare an Equitisation Plan, which covers many important issues regarding the Equitised JSC, including the Minimum Offer Price, the proposed capital and shareholding structure of the Equitised JSC.

·         Sale of shares - investors: During this step, the Equitised SOE will arrange to sell shares in the Equitised JSC to (1) public investors through a public auction (Equitisation IPO), (2) Strategic Investors either directly or through a strategic sale auction, and/or (3) employees and trade unions of the Equitised SOE. The shares to be sold during this step could come from the State’s existing capital in the Equitised SOE (equivalent to existing shares) and/or through new shares to be issued by the Equitised JSC at a later stage.

·         Sale of shares – sale conditions: The number of shares in the Equitisation JSC that an investor is allowed to subscribe to during the equitisation will depend on the proposed shareholding structure of the Equitised JSC set out in the Equitisation Plan. A public investor purchasing shares in the Equitisation IPO or a Strategic Investor purchasing shares before the Equitisation IPO must pay a price higher than the Minimum Offer Price. A Strategic Investor purchasing shares after the Equitisation IPO must pay a price higher than the lowest successful auction price. The shares purchased by a Strategic Investor cannot be transferred in the first five years of incorporation of the Equitised JSC unless otherwise approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders of the Equitised JSC.

·         Sale of shares – allocation of proceeds: Normally, when an existing shareholder sells its shares in a joint stock company, the existing shareholder will keep all profits, including the difference between the sale price and par value of the shares sold. Similarly, when a joint stock company issues new shares, the company will be entitled to profits arising from such issuance, including any premium paid for the shares. However, under equitisation regulations, where new shares of the Equitised JSC are issued, the State and the Equitised JSC will “share” the aggregate sale premium obtained from the sale of both new shares and existing shares in proportion to their respective percentage in the charter capital of the Equitised JSC.

·         Sale of shares – delay in delivery of shares: The Equitised SOE is not a joint stock company and therefore cannot issue shares of its own. As such, shares in the Equitised JSC can only be issued after the Equitised JSC has been incorporated. This results in a substantial delay between the time of payment for shares by the investors participating in equitisation of an Equitised SOE and the time when the shares are actually issued to investors.

·         Conversion and hand-over process: During this step, various tasks are taken so that the Equitised JSC can be up and running, including (1) holding the first General Meeting of Shareholders, (2) incorporating the Equitised JSC, (3) issuance of shares, (4) re-evaluating the State’s capital in the Equitised JSC, (5) preparing an Opening Account of the Equitised JSC, and (6) handing over the assets and liabilities of the Equitised SOE to the Equitised JSC.

·         Conversion and hand-over – potential adverse effects: The actions taken by the Equitised SOE and the equitisation authorities during the hand-over may have an adverse effect on investors purchasing shares in the Equitised JSC. These actions include (1) tax finalisation of the Equitised SOE and (2) revaluation of State’s capital in the Equitised JSC.

·         Timing: The law does not provide a clear timeline for the equitisation process, but does stipulate certain time limits for specific steps. The Prime Minister, however, is given broad authority in determining the schedule and process for the equitisation of a special SOE.