CONCEPT OF COUNTER-GUARANTEE UNDER VIETNAMESE LAWS

1.            There may be a risk that the counter guarantee as defined in Circular 7/2015 dated 25 June 2015 (as amended) may not be considered as a guarantee under the Civil Code 2015 which may results in uncertainty as to the validity and enforceability of the counter guarantee under the Civil Code 2015. Specifically,

1.1.         under Article 335.1 of the Civil Code 2015, guarantee is defined as an undertaking made by a third person (hereinafter referred to as the guarantor) to an obligee (hereinafter referred to as the beneficiary) to perform an obligation on behalf of an obligor (hereinafter referred to as the principal) if the obligation falls due and the principal fails to perform or performs incorrectly the obligation. This suggests that a guarantee must satisfy the following conditions:

NEW DECREE ON SECURITY INTERESTS REGISTRATION – PART 2

In this  post, we continue to discuss the new Decree 99/2022 on security interest registration, which took take effect from 15 January 2023. Part 1 of our analysis can be found here.

·        Expanded scope of registration: Decree 99/2022 also extends security interests, which can be registered at NRAST. Specifically, it allows pledge, deposit, security collateral (ký cược), and escrow deposit (ký quỹ) to be registered at NRAST. Decree 99/2022 also introduces that security interest over rights to use sea area and assets attached to sea area will be registered at a separate registrar under the law on exploitation and use of marine resources.

·        Registration of security over listed securities: Although Decree 155/2020 still applies to registrations of security interests over listed securities, Decree 99/2022 will apply to these registrations on issues not contemplated by Decree 155/2020. It is not clear if this provision will allow a registration of securities over rights attached to listed securities (e.g., rights to receive dividend or interests).

·        Registration of security over “evolving” assets - Decree 99/2022 also provides that the registration of a security over certain types of evolving assets will continue to be effective even if the secured assets have evolved in certain situations. These situations include (1) unlisted securities becoming listed securities and vice versa, (2) inventories or materials being incorporated into other assets, and (3) property rights under contracts to purchase future houses or construction works becoming actual houses and construction works.

·        Registration of mortgage over investment projects – Decree 99/2022 clearly provides that mortgages over investment project using lands will be registered with the land registration department. The previous Decree 102/2017 only contemplates mortgage over residential projects only.

New regulations on bank guarantees in Vietnam

Click here for a pdf version.

On 30 September 2022, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular 11 on bank guarantees (Circular 11/2022). Circular 11/2022 will replace Circular 7/2015 of the SBV dated 25 June 2015 (as amended) from 1 April 2023. This post will discuss some notable points of Circular 11/2022.

1.            Uncertainty of counter guarantee concept

As discussed here, the counter guarantee as defined in Circular 7/2015 may not be considered as a guarantee under the Civil Code 2015 which may results in uncertainty as to the validity and enforceability of the counter guarantee under the Civil Code 2015. This ambiguity remains existing in Circular 11/2022 because the concept of the counter guarantee is kept unchanged under Circular 11/2022.

2.            Improvement in counter-guarantee payment process

2.1.         Article 21.2 of Circular 7/2015 as to the payment process under a counter guarantee suggests that upon receiving a demand from the beneficiary, the guarantor must make payment to the beneficiary first and then seek for the reimbursement from the counter guarantor.

Does an agreement on transfer of land-attached assets require notarization?

The answer is not clear. Under Article 119.2 of the Civil Code 2015, in case the law requires a civil transaction to be made in writing and having notarized, the parties to the transaction must comply with such requirement. In the context of transactions involving land, Article 167.3 of the Land Law 2013 expressly requires agreement on transferring land use right to be notarized or certified, except for the case provided under Article 167.3(b) where at least one party to such agreement is an entity doing real estate business.

However, Article 167.3 of the Land Law 2013 does not make clear whether the agreement on transfer of sole land-attached asset requires a notarization. Article 167.3(b) only provides that a contract for transfer of land-attached asset to which one party or both parties are entity(ies) doing real estate business will be notarized at the parties’ request. It is not clear if the wording of Article 167.3(b) can be interpreted that if neither party to the contract is an entity doing real estate business, then the contract must be notarized.

On the other hand, one may rely on Article 119.2 of the Civil Code 2015 to take a view that the notarization of contract will only mandatory if the law expressly requires so. Accordingly, the notarization of contract for transfer of land-attached asset between the non-real estate business parties should also be optional.