In September 2019, the Supreme Court has given an important opinion to lower courts about how to deal with a loan agreement by a borrower who has failed to obtain appropriate corporate approval. The opinion relates to a borrower being a limited liability company which has failed to obtain Members Council’s approval for a bank loan. However, the opinion should generally be applicable for borrower being joint stock companies. The court’s opinion is not a law. But it could still help lenders in protecting their loans in case a corporate borrower wants to get out of the loans on the ground the loan does not have appropriate corporate approvals.

Pledge (cầm cố) of property is a transaction in which a party (the pledgor) handovers (giao) a property owned by the pledgor to the other party (the pledgee) to secure the performance of a obligation(s). The law does not clarify what action could be considered as “handover” of a property. Therefore, it is not clear whether one can use intangible asset such as the right to claim debt as a pledged asset.

On one hand, the definition of pledge suggests that the pledged assets must be tangible so that it can be handedover or delivered to the pledgee. In this regard, intangible asset cannot be pledged because it cannot be physically delivered from one party to another party.

On the other hand, other provisions of the law suggest that pledge over intangible assets could be permissible because: