Uncertainties regarding merger filing involving regulated companies in Vietnam

Article 13 of Decree 35/2020 sets out two different sets of merger filing threshold. In particular, the one provided under Article 13.2 (Special Threshold) applies to transactions involving regulated companies such as credit institutions, insurance companies, and securities companies (Special Company), whereas the remaining one under Article 13.1 (Regular Threshold) applies to transactions involving remaining types of companies (Regular Company). The two sets of different merger filing thresholds give rise to various uncertainties for a M&A transaction involving a Special Company.

First, in the case of a transaction involving a Special Company and a Regular Company, it is not clear if a merger filing must be made when:

  • Situation 1: The Regular Company does not trigger the Regular Threshold but the Special Company triggers the Special Threshold; or

  • Situation 2: The Regular Company triggers the Regular Threshold and the Special Company triggers the Special Threshold; or

  • Situation 3: The Regular Company triggers the Regular Threshold but the Special Company does not trigger the Special Threshold.

Requirement for contracting parties’ consent in case of de-merger of a Vietnamese company

It is not clear whether, in case of a de-merger of a Vietnamese company, the remaining company must comply with the procedures for transferring contractual rights and obligations under the Civil Code 2015 including obtaining consents from its contracting parties. Under Enterprise Law 2020, a limited liability company or a joint stock company (remaining company) may be de-merged by the following mechanics:

· transferring a part of assets held by remaining company to a new company; and/or

· transferring a part of the rights and obligations of remaining company to new company.

And the remaining company continues to exist after the de-merger.

New Amendments To Investment Law, Enterprise Law, Electricity Law, Residential Housing Law and Other Laws

On 11 January 2022, the National Assembly passed a new law amending 09 laws, including Public Investment Law, Public-Private Partnership Law, Investment Law, Residential Housing Law, Tendering Law, Electricity Law, Enterprise Law, Law On Special Consumption Tax, and Law On Civil Judgment Enforcement (Law 03/2022). Law 03/2022 will come into effect on 1 March 2022. In this post, we will discuss some new key points of Law 03/2022.

1) Enterprise Law 2020

Change of the term “members of the Members’ Council” into “members of the company”

As discussed before, the Enterprise Law 2020 (Articles 49 and 50) only provides for the rights of members of the Members’ Council, but not the rights of the members of the LLC. And many rights of the members of the Members’ Council should be the rights of the members of the LLC such as rights to subscribe for new capital increase or to receive dividends paid by the LLC. The change of the term “members of the Members’ Council” into “members of the company” in Articles 49 and 50 has successfully resolved this problem, although in other provisions, the Enterprise Law 2020 still does not distinguish between the positions of members of the LLC and members of the Members’ Council of the LLC.

Removal of requirement on signatures of dissenting members on meeting minutes; personal liability of the chairperson and the person writing the minutes

The requirement that meeting minutes of the Members’ Council must include signatures of members who disagree to pass such meeting minutes is now removed.

In addition, in the event that the chairperson of the meeting of the Members’ Council/Board Of Directors or the person writing the minutes refuses to sign the meeting minutes, for such minutes to be effective, the Enterprise Law 2020 no longer requires all attending members of the meetings to sign, and only the signatures of the attending members who agree to pass the minutes are necessary. Also, in such event, the chairperson or the person writing the minutes who refuses to sign such minutes must bear personal liability for any loss arising to the company due to their refusal.

The Institutional Representative of the State in a Vietnamese State-owned Enterprise (SOE)

Decree 47/2021 implementing the Enterprise Law 2020 and Decree 10/2019 implementing the Law on Management State Capital 2014 provide helpful clarification on (1) the entities who can act as the owner representative agency (cơ quan đại diện chủ sở hữu) of the State in a SOE, and (2) calculation of State shareholding in an enterprise. In particular,

  • Under Decree 10/2019, the Institutional Representative only include (i) the Commission for the Management of State Capital at Enterprises (CMSC); (ii) Ministries, Ministry-equivalent agencies, Governmental agencies, provincial People’s Committee; and (iii) the State Capital Investment Corporation (SCIC). Accordingly, other SOEs such as EVN or PVN are not regarded as an Institutional Representative. In the past, it is not clear an SOE can be regarded as the Institutional Representative in another SOE.