Licences and Permits for running business in Vietnam

Navigating among numerous licences and permits required by law for running a business in Vietnam has never been easy. There many reasons including:

  • There is no comprehensive list of valid licences and permits available. Therefore, businesses run the risks of missing certain licences and permits. This is particular true as many authorities in Vietnam have the power to issue licences and permits;
  • The time and efforts required for obtaining a licence or permit may be substantial. In practice, the authorities may not always check or enforce the required licence or permit. Therefore, the risk in practice of missing a particular licence and permit varies; and
  • That being said, in theory, missing a required licence or permit may be subject to administrative penalty and, in extreme case, criminal penalty (e.g. see the case against Mr Nguyen Duc Kien).

Regarding the first point, I just come across of report on business licences and permits prepared by the Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI) in December 2013 (MPI List). The MPI seems to have spent substantial time and efforts verifying with all other ministries about the licences and permits issued by such other ministries. As such, the MPI List is quite comprehensive. The MPI List provides for the list of 334 licences and permits requires for various conditional business lines in Vietnam.

Therefore, a business owner may use the information in the MPI List to check if it has obtained all the licences and permits mentioned in the MPI List for its operation, if necessary.

A copy of the MPI List in Vietnamese can be downloaded here.

An unofficial translation of the MPI List by VILAF can be downloaded here.



Actual implementation of the Vietnam Japan Bilateral Investment Treaty

The Agreement between Japan and Vietnam for the Liberalisation, Promotion and Protection of Investment (the Vietnam-Japan BIT) has been signed for almost nine years ago and will in fact be terminated by November 2013, if either Vietnam or Japan has decided to terminate the agreement earlier month. But for the first time since the signing of the Vietnam-Japan BIT, it appears that Vietnamese licensing authorities have actively implemented the provisions of the Vietnam Japan BIT.

The role of "Official Letters" in Vietnam legal system


Official letters (công văn) are regarded as administrative documents (văn bản hành chính) as opposed to a legal instrument and are intended to contain correspondences from various authorities. However, in practice, in official letters addressed to other authorities or companies, many authorities express their views and interpretations of a legal provision. In many cases, Government authorities even give instruction on how certain issues should be addressed if there is no law regarding such issue or the law is not clear.

Accordingly, although official letters are not legal instruments and do not have the force of law, in practice, official letters provide useful interpretive aid and guidance for lawyers and practitioners in Vietnam. The downside of relying on official letters is that they are not always publicly available and the view or interpretation contained in an official letter can be changed in the future or conflict with other official letters or legal instruments. An official letter issued by one authority may not bind another authority if the other authority is not under control of the issuing authority.

Hierarchy of Vietnamese legislation

The law of Vietnam consists of the following main legal instruments, which can be issued by various authorities:


                                                     
Issuing authorities
Instruments dated from 1 January 2009
The National Assembly
Constitution; Laws and Resolutions
The Standing Committee of the National Assembly
Ordinance; and Resolutions
The President
Order; and Decision
The Government
Decrees
The Prime Minister
Decisions
The Supreme Court
Resolutions
The Chief Judge of the Supreme Court
Circulars
The Procurator-General
Circulars
Ministries or ministerial level entities
Circulars
The General State Auditor
Decisions
Local People’s Committees
Decisions, and Directives
Local People’s Council
Resolutions

In addition to the above legal instruments, more than one issuing authorities can together issue a “joint” legal instrument. Legal instruments issued before 1 January 2009 may be issued in a different form under the old Law on Legal Instruments. Nowadays, Vietnamese copies of legal instruments in Vietnam are regularly published on the Official Gazette of the Government and  widely available on the internet (e.g. luatvietnam.com.vn; legal.khaitri.vn). English copies of certain important legal instruments are also available for a fee on certain websites (the most reliable one being www.vietnamlaws.com).

In general, legal instruments issued by higher authorities will have higher validity. Legal instruments issued by central authorities will be applicable nationwide while legal instruments issued by local authorities will be applicable within the specific localities only.

Usually, the “legal framework” covering a specific area of law includes:
·   a Law issued by the National Assembly setting out the general principles of such area;
·   one or more Decrees issued by the Government, which further clarify and implement the Law issued by the National Assembly; and
·   one or more Circulars issued by the relevant Ministries in charge of the area in question, which provide more detailed implementation of the Decrees issued by the Government.

In practice, the drafting of all of the above legal instruments is controlled by the relevant Ministry in charge of the relevant area. For example, the Ministry of Finance will control the drafting of all legislations regarding capital market such as the Law on Securities, the implementing Decrees and Circulars. In addition, usually the Law issued by the National Assembly can only be expected to be fully implemented in practice after the relevant Ministries issue the detailed implementing Circulars. Therefore, there is usually substantial delay between the time a Law of the National Assembly is issued and the time such Law is fully implemented in practice.