Rights to claim for reflective loss under Vietnamese Enterprises Law 2014

If a director of a joint stock company (the Company) breaches his/her fiduciary duties and causes damage to the Company, under Article 161.1 of the Enterprises Law 2014, a shareholder or group of shareholders holding 1% or more ordinary shares for six consecutive months (1% Shareholder) can on its own behalf or on behalf of the Company to make a civil claim against the director. However, it is unclear whether (1) the 1% Shareholder can request the director to pay compensation directly to the 1% Shareholder or (2) the 1% Shareholder can only request the director to pay compensation to the Company. In other words, it is not clear if the 1% Shareholder can claim the director for reflective loss (e.g., the diminution of the value of such Shareholder’s shareholding in the Company).

The following arguments support the view that the 1% Shareholder cannot claim for reflective loss:

·          Under the Enterprises Law 2014, a shareholder is not allowed to withdraw capital from the Company in any form. If a claim for reflective loss is permitted then the 1% Shareholder is indirectly allowed to withdraw capital from the Company which is contrary to the principle provided by the Enterprises Law 2014;

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In ,

Classifying business lines under VSIC and Provisional CPC

Under the current forms applicable to investment procedures to obtain an Investment Registration Certificate or a registration of an acquisition by a foreign investor, the foreign investor and the target company must specify the business lines of the target company according to both Vietnam Standard Industrial Classification (VSIC) and Provisional Central Product Classification (Provisional CPC). The VSIC is based on the International Standard Industrial Classification, not the Provisional CPC. Therefore, there might be some discrepancies among the scope of services under the VSIC and the Provisional CPC. In other words, when registering business lines, foreign investors might face the issue where the scope of a class under one classification might not be covered by a corresponding one under the other classification.

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In ,

Closing Mechanics For Vietnam M&A Deals With Multiple Legal Representatives And Corporate Seals, And Online Submission

Various provisions of the Enterprise Law 2014 can now allow parties to an M&A deal in Vietnam to have more flexibility in designing a closing mechanics. In particular,

·        Multiple legal representatives – In a M&A deal involving a change of control, the buyer would want to control the legal representative position on the closing date. But this involves registration with the Business Registration Authority. Many sellers are reluctant to change the legal representative position before closing without receiving payment of the purchase price.

 In the past, a company can only have one legal representative. However, under the Enterprise Law 2014, a company can have two or more legal representatives. As such, the parties can agree that the target company will have two legal representatives appointed by the seller and the buyer. The legal representative appointed by the seller will continue to run the target company up until closing and will resign on closing. The legal representative of the buyer will assume control on closing. And after closing, the target company will deregister the legal representative appointed by the seller.

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In ,

A closer look at the use of DICA account for M&A transactions in Vietnam – Part 2

Unclear definition of 51% FIE

Under Circular 6/2019, enterprises with foreign direct investment (FIEs), which must open DICA include (1) enterprises which are established by foreign investors (with or without local partners) (Incorporated FIEs); and (2) enterprises which do not fall under (1) but 51% of which are owned by foreign investors (51% FIEs). Normally, one would expect that a 51% FIE must be a FIE, 51% of which is actually owned by foreign investors (Actual 51% FIEs). However, Circular 6/2019 provides that a 51% FIE include enterprises which have foreign investors making capital contribution or purchasing shares resulting in  foreign investors’ owning 51% of the FIE. The use of the words “resulting in” suggests that a 51% FIE could be a 100% locally-owned company, which has potential foreign investors who may acquire 51% or more of its charter capital (Future 51% FIEs). 

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In ,