Reputational damage arising from breaches of a commercial contract under Vietnamese law

In Vietnam, it is not common to see the aggrieved party claiming for damage which causes harm to its reputation (Reputational Damage) due to breaches of commercial contracts by the defaulting party. However, in principle, Reputational Damage due to breaches of a commercial contract should be claimed and recovered under Vietnamese law for the following reasons:

  • Under Article 419.3 and 361.3 of Civil Code 2015, an aggrieved party may claim for moral damage arising from a breach of contract, which includes, among others, moral losses caused by infringement of reputation;

  • Reputational Damage may be considered as “actual and direct loss” under Article 302.2 of Commercial Law 2005 if the aggrieved party has actually incurred the loss of reputation directly arising from a breach of contract by the defaulting party;

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In ,

Unofficial clarifications by Vietnam Competition Authority on merger filing

On 14 January 2021, the Competition Management and Consumer Right Protection Authority (VCA) organized a seminar on “M&A regulation under Vietnamese Competition Law”. During the Q&A sections, the head of the merger filing division responded to various questions raised by lawyers from Venture North Law and other law firm. The official from the VCA has given some notable clarification as follows:

· Internal restructuring. Internal restructuring transactions within companies under the control of the same ultimate parent company is subject to the notification requirement. However, since the parties to the transactions in this case belong to the same group companies, the market share report of each party in this case will include market share information of the individual entity which is the party to the internal restructuring but not the whole company group. It is not clear on what legal basis, the official from VCA gave this explanation.

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In ,

The use of extrinsic evidence for contract interpretation under Vietnamese Law

Does “extrinsic evidence” exist under Vietnamese law?

Vietnamese law does not specifically deal the concept of “extrinsic evidence”. Extrinsic evidence is usually understood as evidence relating to a contract but not appearing on the face of the contract because it comes from other sources, such as statements between the parties or the circumstances surrounding the agreement.

However, Article 404.1 of the Civil Code 2015 provides that:

“Where a contract contains terms and conditions which are unclear, the interpretation of such terms and conditions shall be based not only on the wording of the contract but also on the intentions of the parties which are expressed before and at the time of preparation and performance of the contract.”

Accordingly, the Civil Code 2015 appears to allow the use extrinsic evidence as a source of the contract interpretation.

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In