The Supreme Court’s clarification on various legal issues in Vietnam

n 24 April 2023, the Justices of the Supreme Court of Vietnam (the Supreme Court) hosted an online seminar to tackle some issues that arise in the courts’ trial practice. Official Letter no. 196/TANDTC-PC issued by the Supreme Court on 3 October 2023 (the Official Letter) documents the results from the online seminar in April. The Official Letter contains mainly the clarification and interpretation of the Supreme Court of the existing legal provisions across various areas of law, including penal, civil, commercial, and administrative. Although these clarification and interpretation are non-binding, they constitute an important source of interpretation for the court system to rely on.

In this post, we will discuss some clarifications from the Official Letter that we find interesting or noteworthy:

1)         The subjects capable of committing the crime of “Intentional public disclosure of false information or concealment of information in securities activities” (Article 209 of the Penal Code 2015) are the natural persons or commercial legal persons responsible for public disclosure of information regarding securities, and not the parties to a securities transfer transaction.

Our comments:

The clarification for the Supreme Court is not clear since under the securities regulations, sometimes parties to a securities transaction must make public disclosure about the transaction (e.g., sale or purchase of shares by a major/inside shareholder). So it appears that this crime only applies to a person who violate the disclosure obligations under securities regulations but not to a person who fails to disclosure information under its contractual obligations.

State Bank of Vietnam’s further clarifications on lending regulations

On 8 November 2023, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Official Letter 8631 to publish answers to certain questions on lending regulations under Circular 6/2023 of the SBV dated 28 June 2023 (Circular 6/2023) amending Circular 39/2016 of the SBV dated 30 December 2016 on lending activities of credit institutions (CIs) and/or foreign bank branches with customers (Circular 39/2016).

The table below will highlight some notable answers of the SBV.

No clear legal basis for controlling annual credit growth by Vietnamese credit institutions

In practice, annually, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) allocates annual credit growth limits to each credit institution including the finance company. However, the SBV’s allocation for each credit institution is not publicly available. Each credit institution will be subject to different credit growth limits. Based on newspaper reports, it appears the SBV takes into account the financial status of each credit institution, targeted inflation rate and targeted GDP growth rate to make the decision. In September 2022, it was reported that the SBV should use its ranking system to decide to allocate credit growth limits to each credit institution.

The planned credit growth limit for a year can be adjusted by the SBV during that year based on the assessment of the operation status and liquidity of each credit institution, as well as other development policies.

Difficulties In Dealing with the Administrative Procedures under Personal Data Protection Decree

Decree 13/2023 on Personal Data Protection (PDPD) has stirred a lot of excitement among legal professionals in Vietnam. Recently, such excitement met with the cold hard realities of the difficulties in fulfilling even the basic administrative procedures under PDPD. In particular, in July 2023, the Ministry of Public Security (MPS)  published the required contents of the file for assessment of the impact of personal data processing and the file for assessment of the impact of offshore transferring personal data. The levels of details and analysis required to prepare these files are very demanding. For example, the MPS require these files to include the following information and documents: