Status Of Partially Secured Creditors Under Law On Bankruptcy 2014

Under the Law on Bankruptcy 2014, creditors (chủ nợ) of a bankrupt enterprise include unsecured creditors, partially secured creditors (chủ nợ có bảo đảm một phần) and secured creditors (chủ nợ có bảo đảm). While it is not entirely clear, it appears that partially secured creditors are considered as a separate class of creditors and have their own rights during a bankruptcy proceeding.

Under the Law on Bankruptcy 2014,

  • a secured creditor is defined as a creditor having the right to require the relevant bankrupt enterprise to perform an obligation to repay a secured debt with the assets of the enterprise or a third party; and

  • a partially secured creditor is defined as a creditor having the right to require the relevant bankrupt enterprise to perform an obligation to repay a secured debt with the assets of the enterprise or a third party “where the value of such assets is less than that debt”.

The definition of a secured creditor does not clearly refer to “fully secured creditors” since it does not require the value of the secured assets is equal or more than the debt owed to a secured creditor. Accordingly, technically, the term “secured creditor” could cover both partially secured creditor and fully secured creditor. That said, a more in-depth reading of the Bankruptcy Law 2014 suggests that partially secured creditors are treated as a separate class of creditors. However, it is not clear whether this distinction is created by design or by chance by the draftsman of the Bankruptcy Law 2014.

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In ,

Validity of Board Resignations in Vietnamese Joint Stock Companies

From January 2021, under the Enterprise Law 2020, if a member of the board of directors (the Board) hands in his/her letter of resignation to resign as a Board member in a joint stock company (JSC), he/she may not cease to be a Board Member until approved so by the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) of the relevant JSC. To mitigate the potential issues arising from this provision, a JSC may consider providing that the GMS must dismiss a Board member when he/she tenders his/her resignation. In addition, the resigning Board Member should give authorisation to another appropriate person until he/she is officially dismissed.

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In

Shareholder Rights During The First 90 Days Of Incorporation Of A Joint Stock Company

After incorporating a joint stock company (JSC), the founding shareholders of the JSC will typically have 90 days from the issuance of the enterprise registration certificate (Capital Contribution Period) to pay for the shares they have subscribed as at the incorporation of the JSC (Subscription Shares). Under the Enterprise Law 2020, it is reasonable to consider that during the Capital Contribution Period, the founding shareholders who have not paid for the Subscription Shares in full would have all the shareholders rights including rights to transfer the Shares which have not been paid up. However, the drafting of the Enterprise Law 2020 could give rise to the position that during the Capital Contribution Period shareholder rights, the founding shareholders have only the voting right.

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In

Consequences Of Breaches Of Representations And Warranties Under Vietnamese Law

Introduction

As detailed in a prior post, in our opinion, representations and warranties (warranties) should constitute obligations of the person giving it under Vietnamese law. They could imply an obligation on the part of the person providing them (Warrantor) to guarantee that the stated facts and matters are true. In this post, we will try to examine the consequences of breaches of representations and warranties under Vietnamese law. As discussed further below, depending on the context, a breach of warranties might give rise to:

·        liabilities for breach of warranties as independent obligations; or

·        liabilities for breach of obligations to deliver conforming goods; or

·        liabilities for breach of obligations to provide information to contracting parties; or

·        indemnity (or reimbursement) of losses to the extent the parties have agreed for an indemnity (or reimbursement) of losses arising from a breach of warranties.

Given that “representations and warranties” are exclusively common law concepts and no specific legal framework for them is provided under Vietnamese law, it is important that Vietnamese law contracts should have provisions dealing with the above in order to achieve the intended outcome of the parties.

Based on the discussion below, probably, the preferable approach is to have specific wording in the share sale and purchase agreement that warranties form part of the description and quality of the sale shares so that, among other things, seller could be subject to the remedies applicable to breach of obligation to deliver non-conforming goods.

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In ,