The Vietnam Supreme Court’s opinion on unauthorised corporate loans

In September 2019, the Supreme Court has given an important opinion to lower courts about how to deal with a loan agreement by a borrower who has failed to obtain appropriate corporate approval. The opinion relates to a borrower being a limited liability company which has failed to obtain Members Council’s approval for a bank loan. However, the opinion should generally be applicable for borrower being joint stock companies. The court’s opinion is not a law. But it could still help lenders in protecting their loans in case a corporate borrower wants to get out of the loans on the ground the loan does not have appropriate corporate approvals.

A Comparison between Vietnam's Commitments in Financial Services under WTO, CPTPP and EVFTA

The full text of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (CPTPP) and the Free Trade Agreement between Vietnam and European Union (EVFTA) have been made available for public information. The table below tries to compare the existing commitments of Vietnam under WTO Agreement, CPTPP and EVFTA Agreement in Financial Services. The comparison is done by Tran Thuy Tien, and Nguyen Bich Ngoc.

Notes:

Decree 35/2020 – New merger filing thresholds in Vietnam

During the Covid-19 outbreak, the Vietnamese Government issued an important decree implementing the Competition Law 2018. Among other things, the Government has introduced a (mostly) complete new set of merger filing thresholds. Unfortunately, like social distancing measures applied during Covid-19, the new merger filing thresholds could potentially put more “legal distance” between parties to M&A deals in Vietnam especially those conducted by large corporations.

Under the old Competition Law 2004, the Government only applies the “market share” test to determine whether a merger filing should be made. Due to the vagueness and difficulty of determining market share numbers in practice, only a few M&A deals are subject to merger filing under the old Competition Law 2004. Now, it is no longer the case. In addition to the old market share test, Decree 35/2020 introduces two new “bright-line” tests (i.e., “size- of-person” test and “size-of-transaction” test) without any exception. Any M&A transaction triggering any of the three separate and independent tests will now need to be reported to the not-yet-established National Competition Committee (NCC). In short, the NCC now presumably has more testing tools for a merger filing than the competition authorities in EU(one), US (two), and China (one), which unfortunately is not a good sign for M&A lawyers in Vietnam.

Details of each test for each industry are set out in the table below (US$ numbers are approximates):

A Comparison Between Vietnam’s Trade In Service Commitments under WTO, CPTPP, and EVFTA

The full text of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (CPTPP) and the Free Trade Agreement between Vietnam and European Union (EVFTA) have been made available for public information. Please download here a table comparing the existing commitments of Vietnam under WTO Agreement, CPTPP and EVFTA Agreement for certain service sectors. The comparison is done by Tran Thuy Tien, Nguyen Thuc Anh and Le Minh Thuy.

Notes:

  • Vietnam’s specific commitments are contained in two Annexes (Annex I and Annex II) of Chapter 9 of the CPTPP and Chapter 8 and Annex 8-B of the EVFTA Agreement. The list below covers specific commitments in specific sectors or sub-sectors. But there are commitments which apply to all sectors and are not listed in here.

  • CPC codes are as used in the Provisional Central Product Classification.

  • No limitation means no limits on national treatments in terms of Foreign ownership, forms of investment or other restriction.

  • Branching is generally not allowed unless otherwise indicated.