In other jurisdictions, a shadow director is commonly understood as a person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of the company are accustomed to act. The concept of shadow director is to capture those who are not formally directors of a company but actually control such company through actions of the directors of such company.
Vietnamese law does not contain the concept of shadow directors. Instead, Vietnamese law adopts a “form over substance” approach whereby a person is regarded as a Director of a public Joint Stock Company (Public JSC) if:
- such person satisfies the conditions of being a Board Member and a General Director; and
- such person is appointed by the Shareholders Meeting as a Board Member or by the Board as the General Director of the Public JSC.
In Vietnam, it is not an uncommon practice for controlling or influential shareholders of a Public JSC to interfere the operation of the Public JSC through the Board of such Public JSC. For example,
- the State Capital Investment Corporation (SCIC), a large holding State-owned company with controlling stakes in many companies in Vietnam, expressly requires its representatives who sit on the Board of a joint stock company to vote according to instructions given by the SCIC on various matters; and
- Certain Large Public JSCs such as Asia Commercial
Bank and FPT
in Vietnam have also created “Founding Committee” (Hội đồng Sáng lập) comprising of former Board Members or influential shareholders of the relevant Public JSC. The Founding Committees of these Public JSCs are entitled to attend meetings of the Board, make recommendation and advice to the Board.
If the Boards of these Public JSCs regularly act in accordance with instructions of SCIC or the Founding Committee then SCIC or members of the Founding Committee may be regarded as shadow directors of these Public JSCs under the law of other jurisdictions. However, the lack of provisions regulating shadow directors under Vietnamese law would make it more difficult for imposing statutory duties of a Director to controlling or influential shareholders of Public JSCs to interfere the operation of a Public JSC through the Board of such Public JSC.
That being said, in theory, under certain provisions of Vietnamese law, a shadow director of a Public JSC may still potentially be subject to liabilities of the Directors of such Public JSC:
- Under Article 8 of the Enterprise Law, a Public JSC is entitled to operate and run its business in its own discretion. In addition, Article 11.7 of the Enterprise Law prohibits any action, which prevents shareholders of a joint stock company from exercising their rights in accordance with the Enterprise Law and the charter of the company. If a controlling or influential shareholder interferes the operation of a Public JSC through the Board of such Public JSC then such controlling or influential shareholder may be arguably regarded as preventing other shareholders from exercising their shareholders’ right or interfering the right of the Public JSC to run its business in its own discretion.
- Article 80.5 of the Enterprise Law provides that a shareholder holding ordinary shares in a joint stock company must bear “personal liability” where such shareholder performs one of the following acts in any form in the name of the company: (1) to breach the law; (2) to conduct business and other transactions for the personal benefit of itself or other organisations or individuals; or (3) to pay premature debts where the company is likely to be in financial danger.
- Article 147 of the Enterprise Law prohibits a parent company from interfering with the operation of its subsidiaries other than by exercising the right of a shareholder in its subsidiaries. If a manager of a parent company interfering with the operation of its subsidiaries then the manager may be jointly liable for the damages caused to the subsidiaries.
The following is a non-exhaustive list of licenses, permits and requirements on environment which an industrial park in Vietnam need to comply with.
1. Environment impact assessment report (EIAR – Báo cáo đánh giá tác động môi trường) or environment protection plan (EPP – Kế hoạch bảo vệ môi trường).
2. Confirmation on completion of the environmental protection works (Xác nhận hoàn thành công trình bảo vệ môi trường).
The following is a non-exhaustive list of licenses, permits and requirements on firefighting and prevention applicable for an industrial park in Vietnam which are subject to the monitor of firefighting and prevention and may pose a risk of fire and explosion.
1) Appraisal of firefighting and prevention design (Thẩm duyệt thiết kế về phòng cháy chữa cháy) by the competent authority before commencing the construction.
2) Acceptance of firefighting and prevention (Nghiệm thu về phòng cháy và chữa cháy) by the competent authority before putting the construction works into operation.
3) Compulsory fire and explosion insurance for the properties of the industrial park.
Foreign banks located outside of Vietnam extending cross-border loans to borrowers in Vietnam should be aware of the following:
Under WTO commitments, Vietnam gives an “unbound” commitment regarding cross-border lending services. The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-pacific Partnership (CPTPP) also does not open for cross-border lending services. This means that the Vietnamese Government has discretion to allow or disallow cross-border lending;
On 11 January 2019, the Supreme Court issued Resolution 1 guiding the application of several regulations on interest, interest rate and relevant penalty (Resolution 1/2019). Resolution 1/2019 will take effect from 15 March 2019. Below are some salient points of Resolution 1/2019
Resolution 1/2019 clearly states that the interest rate caps of the Civil Code 2005 and 2015 will not apply to credit contracts between banks and its customers. In the past, there has been long debate regarding whether the interest rate caps of the Civil Code 2005 and 2015 will apply to credit contracts.
If the interest rate, overdue interest on principal and overdue interest on interest are higher than the permitted cap, the exceeding interest which has been paid will be deducted from the principal of the loan.
Collective action mechanism among bondholders is one of the common features in terms and conditions of a corporate bond. Two important features of collective action mechanism are:
· the use of a bond trustee to act for the benefit of bondholders; and
· the use of bondholders’ meeting to allow a decision of a majority (or super-majority) of bondholder regarding the bond (e.g. changing the terms of the bond) to bind minority bondholders who disagree with such decision.
Arguably, if the provisions of bondholders’ meeting are included in the terms of the bond and a bondholder agrees to such term then the provisions on a civil transaction under Civil Code 2015 may allow the use of bondholders’ meeting in Vietnam. However, the validity of a decision of a bondholders’ meeting which is not approved by all bondholders is still questionable under Vietnamese law. This is because:
Under the Law on E-Transactions, an e-signature (chữ ký điện tử) is defined as being created in the form of words, script, numerals, symbols, sounds or in other forms by electronic means, logically attached or associated with a data message, and being capable of identifying the person who has signed the data message, and being capable of identifying the consent of that signatory to the contents of the signed data message.
According to Article 24.1 of the Law on E-Transactions, an e-signature of an individual affixed to a data message will be legally equivalent to the signature of such individual affixed to a written document if:
· the method of creating the e-signature permits to identify the signatory and to indicate his/her approval of the contents of the data message; and
· such method is sufficiently reliable and appropriate to the purpose for which the data message was originated and sent.
Accordingly, if an user being an individual of an e-commerce website, who can be identified by his/her username, password, and other means of verification (e.g., OTP code), clicks on a confirmation button of an online order then such action can be regarded as creating and affixing an e-signature to the online order by the individual user. This is because:
On 28 December 2018, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular 42 amending current foreign currency borrowing regulations (in Circular 24 of the SBV dated 8 December 2015, as amended from time to time (Circular 24/2015)) (Circular 42/2018). Circular 42/2018 will take effect from 1 January 2019.
Changes to permitted lending purpose
Vietnamese banks only lend in foreign currency for a few limited purposes. Circular 42/2018 has following changes to these purposes:
On 20 June 2018, the Ministry of Justice issued Circular 8 on the registration and provision of information on security interest and contracts (Circular 8/2018). Circular 8/2018 will replace Circular 5/2011 on the same subject from 4 August 2018.
Name of the object of the registration
The object of registration under Circular 5/2011 is secured transactions (giao dịch bảo đảm), which is in line with the Civil Code 2005. However, the term “secured transaction” is almost removed from the Civil Code 2015 and the registration is now the registration of security interest (biện pháp bảo đảm). Circular 8/2018 adopts such approach and determined the object of registration is security interest to be consistent with the new Civil Code 2015.
The Ministry of Finance has released a latest draft amendment to the Securities Law 2006 (https://tinyurl.com/ydc44zyd), which is scheduled to be passed in the second half of 2019. It looks like that any major law in Vietnam will need to undergo major changes in every 10 years whether or not the changes are necessary. The draft amendments include the following major changes regarding capital raising process:
In December 2018, the Government issues Decree 163/2018 to replace Decree 90/2011 on private issuance of corporate by Vietnamese companies from February 2019. Decree 163/2018 introduces certain new important points as follows:
· To be able issue bonds, a company is no longer required to be profitable in year before the proposed issuance. Instead, the company only needs to operate for at least one year and its financial statement is audited by a qualified auditor. Issuer who has undergone certain restructuring (e.g., merger, conversion or division) may rely on the historical operation of other related companies to meet the one year operating test;
· Secondary trading of privately-issued bonds is limited within up to 100 investors excluding “professional investors” within one year from the issuance date. The new limitation seems to aim at the practice of issuing bonds privately at the first place and reselling the same to public investors in secondary market;
Vietnamese banking regulations do not provide for a clear definition of a financial lease (cho thuê tài chính). The lack of a clear definition may result in unnecessary legal risks for parties to a cross-border lease transaction (e.g., an aircraft lease). For example, if a cross-border lease is regarded as a financial lease, then the lease may need to be registered with the State Bank of Vietnam as a foreign loan.
Under the Law on Credit Institution 2010, the act of finance leasing is defined to be (1) the extension of medium and long-term credit; (2) on the basis of a finance leasing contract; and(3) satisfying one of the following conditions:
upon expiry of the lease under the contract, the lessee may take over ownership of leased assets or may continue to lease them under the agreement of the parties; or
upon expiry of the lease under the contract, the lessee shall have the priority right to purchase the leased assets at a nominal value less than the actual value of the leased assets as at the date of purchase; or
the minimum term of the lease of any single asset must equal at least 60% of the period necessary for depreciation of such leased asset; or
the total rent for any single asset stipulated in the finance lease contract must be equal at least to the value of such asset at the signing date of the contract.