Transfer of loan commitments between banks in Vietnam

Vietnamese banking regulations do not have clear mechanics for transfer of loan commitments between banks or credit institutions in Vietnam. In particular:

Under Circular 9/2015 of the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) on loan transfer, loan transfer is defined to mean the transfer of “the right to collect loan” arising from the lending operation by a bank (the Original Bank) to a loan purchaser, which may or may not be a bank. The definition of loan under Circular 9/2015 does not include loan commitment where a bank only commits to lend to a borrower but has not actually disbursed the loan. Accordingly, all the loan transfer mechanics under Circular 9/2015 do not directly apply to transfer of loan commitment.
One way for banks to overcome the lack of regulations on transfer of loan commitment is for the Original Bank to actually disburse the loan and then transfer such loan to another bank (New Bank) in accordance with Circular 9/2015. However, under Circular 9/2015, if the loan purchaser is a bank, then the SBV requires the New Bank to have a loan purchase license. Not all banks in Vietnam are granted a loan trading licence by the SBV.
Under the lending regulations (Circular 39/2016), a loan commitment could be understood to be an undertaking by a bank to handover to the client an amount of money to use. Therefore, it appears that a loan commitment is regarded as an obligation to lend by a bank (which, of course, is usually conditional on the borrower’s satisfying certain conditions precedent). Therefore, transfer of a loan commitment is regarded as a transfer of obligation and will require the consent of the borrower. Borrower’s consent is usually not a problem since any proper loan agreement will include a transfer clause which allows the bank to transfer any of its rights and obligations under the loan agreement to a third party.

New guidance on expedited proceedings for disputes arising from handling of non-performing loans in Vietnam

On 15 May 2018, the Supreme Court issued Resolution 3 on expedited proceedings for disputes arising from handling of non-performing loans (NPL) and security assets of NPL (Resolution 3). Resolution 3 is an implementing legislation of Resolution 42 of the National Assembly on NPLs (Resolution 42). Resolution 3 takes effect from 1 July 2018 and will expire when Resolution 42 expires in August 2022. Resolution 3 will apply to claims (1) accepted for hearing by the courts before 1 July 2018 but have not been brought to trial; and (2) accepted during its term but still in process when it expires. Resolution 3 cannot be based on to protest against effective judgment under retrial and cassation.

Resolution 42 allows disputes relating to security asset of an NPL to be conducted under expedited proceedings. Resolution 3 further clarifies that:

Disputes on obligations to hand-over security assets of an NPL is clarified to be dispute relating to the case where the securing party or the party holding the security asset (1) does not hand-over the security asset, or (2) does not hand-over correctly according to the request of the secured party or the party having right to enforce the security asset; and
Dispute on right to enforce security asset of NPL is clarified to be dispute on the determination of person having right to enforce the security asset of an NPL.

Applicability of indirect ownership in determining ownership limit in a Vietnamese joint stock bank

A shareholder (especially a foreign shareholder) in a Vietnamese joint stock bank (VN Bank) must know how much its shareholding in the VN Bank is. This is because (1) there are ownership caps applicable to a single shareholder or a group of related persons, and (2) a “major shareholder” is required to obtain an approval from the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV). Since the Law on Credit Institutions 2010 (LCI 2010) and Decree 1/2014 introduces the concept of “indirect ownership”, it may be difficult to determine the exact shareholding ownership of a shareholder in a VN Bank for the purpose of (1) and (2) above. Indirect ownership is defined as an organization or individual owning the charter capital or shareholding capital of a credit institution via a related person or trust investment.

The importance of shareholding ownership ratio of a foreign investor in a Vietnamese commercial bank

It is important to determine the shareholding ownership ratio of a foreign investor in a Vietnamese commercial bank (a VN Bank), since:

there is different foreign ownership cap applicable to each type of foreign investor in a VN Bank (see here);
there are different requirements applicable to a foreign investor in a VN Bank depending on the shareholding ownership ratio of such foreign investor. For example, a foreign investor with 10% or more shareholding ownership must, among other things, have an international credit rating and must have a total assets of US$ 10 billion or more (for investors being financial institutions) or a charter capital of US$ 1 billion or more (for investors being non-financial institutions);
there are different approval procedures applicable to a foreign investor acquiring shares in a VN Bank depending on the shareholding ownership ratio that the investor intends to acquire. For example, an acquisition resulting in a less-than 5% shareholding ownership ratio by a foreign investor is not subject to approval by the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV). An acquisition resulting in a shareholding ownership ratio between 5% to less-than 10% is subject to an approval procedures different from an acquisition resulting in a a shareholding ownership ratio of more than 10% (see here); and
there are different transfer restrictions applicable to a foreign investor in a VN Bank depending on its shareholding ownership ratio. For example, a foreign investor with a less-than 5% shareholding ownership is not subject to any share transfer restriction. A foreign investor with a shareholding ownership ratio between 5% to less-than 10% may transfer shares subject to SBV’s approval for transfer shares by a major shareholder. A 10% or more foreign investor is not allowed to transfer shares for at least three years.

However, determination of the foreign ownership ratio held by a foreign investor in a VN Bank is not always straightforward since the Law on Credit Institution 2010 and Decree 1/2014 may take into account “indirect ownership” (sở hữu gián tiếp) when determining the foreign ownership ratio held by a foreign investor (see here).

Info

Comment

Vietnam Business Law