Pre-emptive rights over new shares of Vietnamese shareholding companies

At law, the following provisions suggest that existing shareholders of a Vietnamese shareholding company have pre-emptive rights over new shares issued by the company:

  • Under Article 79.1(c) of the Enterprise Law, an ordinary shareholder in a shareholding company has priority right to subscribe for new shares issued by the company in proportion to the shareholding of such shareholder in the company;

  • Article 87.2 of the Enterprise Law provides that when a shareholding company issues new ordinary shares and offers such shares to all ordinary shareholders, the company must send a written notice to each shareholder setting out the terms of the offer and a reasonable period for the shareholder to consider the offer. If there is any shareholder failing to subscribe for the shares offered to them, the Board of Directors (the Board) of the company is entitled to offer such shares to a third party on terms, which are not more favourable than the terms originally offered to the relevant shareholder; and

  • Article 87.2(c) of the Enterprise Law provides that a shareholder may transfer its pre-emptive right to other persons.

On the other hand, there are certain provisions, which indicate that there may be exemptions to the pre-emptive rights of existing shareholders under the Enterprise Law. In particular,

  • Article 87.6 of the Enterprise Law states that “the Government shall provide implementing regulations for private placement of shares”. One therefore may argue that in case of a private placement of shares, there is no pre-emptive right. This is consistent with the fact that the regulations on private placement of shares which involve issuance of new shares to third party investor do not specifically require each existing shareholder to waive their pre-emptive rights before the company can issue new shares to third party investors. In practice, it seems that the regulators do not take into account pre-emptive rights of existing shareholders if the new share issuance is approved by the shareholders meeting; and

  • The Ministry of Finance has issued a model charter applicable to public companies in Vietnam, which provides that new shares must be offered to existing shareholders proportionally “unless otherwise decided by the General Meeting of Shareholders” (Decision 121 of the MOF dated 26 July 2012). A resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders of a public company (which adopts the model charter) to issue shares to a specific entity could therefore be interpreted as constituting an exception to the right to personal notice and waiver that is in the Enterprise Law.

 

Info
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In , ,

Vietnamese merger regulations

Under the Vietnamese Competition Law, an “economic concentration” is defined to include the following types of transactions:

(a)        Merger of enterprises means the transfer by one or more enterprise(s) of all of  its lawful assets, rights, obligations and interests to another enterprise and at the same time the termination of the existence of the merging enterprise(s).

(b)       Consolidation of enterprises means the transfer by two or more enterprises of all of their lawful assets, rights, obligations and interests to form a new enterprise and at the same time the termination of the existence of the consolidating enterprises.

(c)        Acquisition of an enterprise means the purchase by one enterprise of all or part of the assets of another enterprise sufficient to control or govern the activities of one or all of the businesses of the acquired enterprise. Controlling or governing all or one of the businesses of another enterprise means an enterprise (controlling enterprise) obtains ownership of the assets of another enterprise (controlled enterprise) sufficient to give the controlling enterprise 50% of the voting rights at the general meeting of shareholders, the board of management or other level sufficient according to law or the charter of the controlled enterprise to enable the controlling enterprise to govern the financial policies and operations of the controlled enterprise aimed at receiving economic benefit from the business operations of the controlled enterprise.

(d)       Joint venture between enterprises means two or more enterprises together contribute a portion of their lawful assets, rights, obligations and interests to form a new enterprise.

Article 20.1 of the Competition Law provides that if the parties to a merger have a combined market share in a relevant market from 30% to up to 50% then the parties must notify the Vietnam Competition Authority of the enterprise acquisition before completing the merger unless the parties to the merger still remain a small and medium enterprise after the merger. A small and medium enterprise under Vietnamese law is subject to different criteria based on its business lines. But in general, a small and medium enterprise should not have more than 300 employees and a charter capital of more than VND 100 billion (about US$ 4.8 million).  An economic concentration with a combined market share of more than 50% is prohibited unless an exemption is granted.

Vietnam Business Law Blog
Vietnam's Employment Law 2025: What Employers and Employees Need to Know

On 16 June 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam officially passed the Employment Law 2025, replacing the Employment Law 2013. The new law will take effect on 1 January 2026. Among its most significant revisions are changes to unemployment insurance (UI) regulations, aimed at expanding coverage, increasing benefits, and clarifying the responsibilities of both employers and employees. This article summarizes the most notable updates to Vietnam’s unemployment insurance system and other key changes under the new Employment Law 2025.

1. Major Changes to the Unemployment Insurance System

·       Broader Scope of Participants: The Employment Law 2025 broadens the scope of mandatory UI participation to include (1) employees with labor contracts of at least one month and (2) part-time employees under similar contracts whose monthly salary exceeds the minimum wage.

·       Additional Exclusions: The Employment Law 2025 now excludes the following groups from UI participation: (1) employees who meet the conditions for receiving retirement pensions (not just those already receiving them, as under the 2013 Law), (2) employees receiving other social insurance benefits or monthly government allowances, and (3) employees on probationary contracts. The new law also broadens the situations where UI contributions are not required. Now, employees who do not receive a salary for 14 working days or more in a month will not be subject to UI contributions. (Previously, under Decree 28/2015, this only applied to those on maternity or sick leave for that duration).

·       Contribution Rates and Salary Basis: The UI contribution rate is set at a maximum of 1% of the employee’s monthly salary, giving the government flexibility to adjust the rate below this ceiling if needed. The salary basis for UI contributions now includes the monthly salary plus any allowances or other regular additional payments. This is a change from the Employment Law 2013, which based UI contributions only on the salary used for social insurance.

Vietnam’s New Capital Gains Tax Rules For Foreign Enterprises

On 14 June 2025, the National Assembly passed the amended Corporate Income Tax Law 2025 (CIT Law 2025). Among other things, this legislation is expected to bring significant changes in determining the method of calculating tax for capital transfer and securities transfer transactions (Capital Gains Tax) undertaken by foreign companies. This post aims to provide a comprehensive and clear overview by analyzing and comparing these new regulations with those stipulated in the Corporate Income Tax Law 2008 (CIT Law 2008).

1)         Definition of Taxable Income Arising in Vietnam for Foreign Companies

A key area of adjustment in the CIT Law 2025 relates to the definition of taxable income arising in Vietnam for foreign companies, making it more transparent.

Under the CIT Law 2008, the specific definition of such income was not explicitly clarified within the law itself; rather, it was detailed in Decree 218/2013 guiding the CIT Law 2008. In contrast, the CIT Law 2025 has directly incorporated this definition, clearly stating that taxable income arising in Vietnam for foreign companies is income originating from Vietnam, irrespective of the location where business activities are conducted.

Some Drawbacks of Resolution 222 on Vietnam’s International Financial Center

On 27 June 2025, as a foundational step for establishing an international financial hub in Vietnam, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopts the Resolution 222 on the International Financial Center (IFC) in Vietnam (specifically in Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang City) (Resolution 222). However, when compared to international best practices, the Resolution reveals several weaknesses that may deter international investors.

Based on a comparative analysis, here are the main drawbacks:

  • Isolation from Vietnam domestic markets – Perhaps the most important benefits of investing in an IFC in Vietnam is the opportunity to access Vietnam domestic capital and financial market. Unfortunately, Resolution 222 does not clearly contemplate how an IFC member can invest or interact with Vietnam domestic capital and financial market. Without a better access to Vietnamese domestic markets, investors from regional financial centers may have less incentives to move to the IFC in Vietnam.

  • Unstable and unpredictable legal framework: Resolution 222 took effect from 1 September 2025. After five years, the legal framework contemplated by Resolution 222 will be reviewed by the National Assembly and may be replaced by a Law on International Financial Center. Existing projects can continue to operate under “existing” legal frameworks at such time. Given the amount of implementing legislation and the infrastructure required, it may take one to two years for the IFC to be up and running. Accordingly, investors may only have around three to four years to actually run theirs businesses before a potential new law will be issued. During the operation of the IFC, a regulation can be issued to limit the rights of IFC members to ensure “national interests” and “prevent threats against national security”. This provision is very broad and vague and could allow IFC regulators to change their regulations at any time.

Key Updates And Revisions To Vietnam's Enterprise Registration Procedures Under Decree 168/2025

The Vietnamese Government has recently issued Decree 168/2025 on enterprise registration, which replaces the previous Decree 1/2021. This blog post highlights several significant changes and clarifications to enterprise registration procedures under Decree 168/2025.

1)         Additional forms of documents evidencing the completion of capital contribution and transfer

Decree 168/2025 introduces new options for documenting the completion of capital contributions or capital transfers in the enterprise registration application dossiers as follows:

For evidence of the completion of a transfer, one of the following documents is now accepted:

•          A copy or extract of the member register or shareholder register.

•          A copy or original of the liquidation minutes of the transfer contract.

•          Bank confirmation of completed payment.

•          Other documents validly proving the completion of share or capital contribution transfer as prescribed by law.

Private Corporate Bonds: Ambiguity concerning the permissible use of bond proceeds

Decree 153/2020 (as amended), which governs private corporate bond offerings, creates ambiguity concerning the permissible use of bond proceeds, especially when parent companies aim to finance their subsidiaries.

Decree 153/2020 stipulates that bond proceeds can be used for implementing investment programmes and projects, restructuring debts of the issuing enterprise itself, or for other purposes sanctioned by specialised laws. The ambiguity stems specifically from how the qualifier “of the issuing enterprise itself” applies to these permissible uses. This leads to two primary interpretations:

Key Changes to the Investment Law 2020

The recently enacted law amending the Investment Law 2020 (Amendment Law 2025), effective 1 July 2025, introduces the following key changes:

1.           Major Decentralization of Approval Authority

1.1.       Under the Amendment Law 2025, the Provincial People's Committees, rather than the Prime Minister under the previous law, have the authority to grant investment policy approval for the following projects:

Law on Management of State Capital 2025 – A Change in Direction

A pdf version of this post can be downloaded here.

In June 2025, the National Assembly passed a new Law on Management of State Capital (Law on State Capital 2025) replacing the same law issued in 2014 and amended in 2018 (Law on State Capital 2014). The Law on State Capital 2025 have given the individuals managing State-owned (or controlled) enterprises (i.e., the Members’ Council or the Chairman) substantial flexibility to run their businesses. In this post, we discussed some key changes introduced by the Law on State Capital 2025. A comparison between the Law on State Capital 2025 and Law on State Capital 2014 by Deep Research of Gemini 2.5 Pro can be found here.

Clearer scope of application

Law on State Capital 2025 clearly provides that enterprises which more than 50% charter capital or voting shares of which is held by the State are also subject to this law. This point is not clear under the Law on State Capital 2014.

Definition of State Capital

Under Law on State Capital 2025, State capital in a State-owned enterprise only includes the contributed capital portion held by the State out of the total owner's equity of the enterprise. In addition, the Law on State Capital 2025 defines State capital by reference to the holding percentage of the State. This new approach is a significant change from the Law on State Capital 2014 because:

  • The Law on State Capital 2025 excludes other funding sources such as the state budget, public assets, and development investment funds from the definition of "State capital" within an enterprise. Instead, the Law on State Capital 2025 classifies these as sources of capital and assets to be used for investing state capital in enterprises; and

  • in many scenarios, the holding percentage is more important than the absolute amount

A Question of Due Process: The Untimely Publication of Vietnam's New Laws Introduction

The 9th working session of the National Assembly of Vietnam, which lasted 35 days and ends on 27 June 2025, is probably the most productive working session of the National Assembly for several decades. In this one working session, the National Assembly has passed a number of laws equal to all laws passed by the National Assembly in 17 previous working sessions.  

Immediately after the conclusion of the National Assembly’s working sessions in late June 2025, newspapers and social media in Vietnam were flooded with information about these new laws and regulations. Information about these new laws was important since many of those laws would take effect on 1 July 2025 – only one week after the National Assembly concluded its working session.

As part of our marketing efforts, we also set out to review those laws and resolutions for our legal updates. However, when we first started, our lawyers struggled to locate the final text of many of these laws. For us, a “final text” of a law would be a scanned PDF of these laws bearing the seal of the National Assembly and signatures of the Chairman of the National Assembly or an official publication on official websites such as the Official Gazette or the National Database of Legal Documents.

Legal Challenges Arising from Vietnam's Administrative Reorganization

Introduction

From 1 July 2025, Vietnam’s local Government system formally operates according to a new “two-tier” system in 34 provinces as opposed to the old “three-tier” system in 63 provinces. In the new system, there are only two levels of local Government including provinces (tỉnh) and wards (xã, phường). Government agencies at district level no longer exist. Vietnam also combines several existing wards to form a larger ward. As a result, we estimate that Vietnam now has about 3,300 local people’s committees down from 10,000 local people’s committees.    

To achieve this, by 1 July 2025, the National Assembly and the Government have, among other things, amended the Constitution, amended the Law on Organisation of Local Government, issued 34 resolutions and 28 Decrees to restructure the local government system. Unfortunately, despite such herculean efforts, it appears that the new regulations have not addressed adequately various legal issues arising from the restructuring. In this post we will discuss some of these issues. More information can be found from the attached research generated by the latest AI LLM from Google (Gemini Pro 2.5).

No clear geographical boundaries between various local authorities at wards levels.  

It appears that on 1 July 2025, the Government did not establish clear geographical boundaries between the newly established wards. This is because the Standing Committee of the National Assembly sets a deadline of 30 September 2025 for the Government to do so for each province. Until a source of truth of the geographical boundaries at wards level is set up, many companies and individuals may not know for sure the correct addresses that they may use in their operations including application submitted to the authorities, invoices issued to clients, or contracts.

Overhaul To Vietnam Court System From 1 July 2025

In 2024, the National Assembly of Vietnam enacted the new Law on Organization of the People’s Court (Law on Courts), which implemented significant reforms to the structure of the People’s Court system in comparison to the 2014 Law on Courts. Shortly after the promulgation of the 2024 Law on Courts, Vietnam initiated a substantial reorganisation of its administrative divisions, transitioning from a three-tier (province, district, commune) model to a two-tier (province, commune) model. Consequently, in 2025, the National Assembly approved an amendment to the 2024 Law on Courts to align the court system with the updated two-tier administrative division model (2024-2025 Law on Courts). Below are our discussions on the key changes under the 2024-2025 Law on Courts when compared to the 2014 Law on Courts.

1)           Complete Restructuring of the Court Hierarchy

The court system is majorly reformed with the removal of the High People's Courts (Tòa án nhân dân cấp cao) and replacement of District Courts with Regional Court (Tòa án nhân dân khu vực).

Info
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In ,

Is simple provision of inside information prohibited under Vietnamese securities law?

Under the Securities Law, inside information means information about a public company which has not yet been disclosed and which, if disclosed, could have a major impact on the price of the securities of such public company. The Securities Law prohibits the use of inside information to purchase or trade in shares of public companies. There is no exception to the prohibition at law.

The Securities Law also prohibits “disclosing or supplying inside information to or advising another person to purchase or sell securities on the basis of inside information”. It is not clear if the phrase “to purchase or sell securities on the basis of inside information” qualifies (1) for the word “advising” only or (2) also for the words “disclosing or supplying inside information”.  In case of (1), one could take a strict view that the mere disclosing or supplying inside information to another person is prohibited even if such person does not purchase of sell shares on the basis of the inside information provided. However, interpretation (1) is not reasonable because it would capture anyone (including, for example, employees or auditors of the public company, itself) who need to have access to inside information for providing services to the public company or other reasonable purposes.

Vietnam Business Law Blog
Vietnam's Employment Law 2025: What Employers and Employees Need to Know

On 16 June 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam officially passed the Employment Law 2025, replacing the Employment Law 2013. The new law will take effect on 1 January 2026. Among its most significant revisions are changes to unemployment insurance (UI) regulations, aimed at expanding coverage, increasing benefits, and clarifying the responsibilities of both employers and employees. This article summarizes the most notable updates to Vietnam’s unemployment insurance system and other key changes under the new Employment Law 2025.

1. Major Changes to the Unemployment Insurance System

·       Broader Scope of Participants: The Employment Law 2025 broadens the scope of mandatory UI participation to include (1) employees with labor contracts of at least one month and (2) part-time employees under similar contracts whose monthly salary exceeds the minimum wage.

·       Additional Exclusions: The Employment Law 2025 now excludes the following groups from UI participation: (1) employees who meet the conditions for receiving retirement pensions (not just those already receiving them, as under the 2013 Law), (2) employees receiving other social insurance benefits or monthly government allowances, and (3) employees on probationary contracts. The new law also broadens the situations where UI contributions are not required. Now, employees who do not receive a salary for 14 working days or more in a month will not be subject to UI contributions. (Previously, under Decree 28/2015, this only applied to those on maternity or sick leave for that duration).

·       Contribution Rates and Salary Basis: The UI contribution rate is set at a maximum of 1% of the employee’s monthly salary, giving the government flexibility to adjust the rate below this ceiling if needed. The salary basis for UI contributions now includes the monthly salary plus any allowances or other regular additional payments. This is a change from the Employment Law 2013, which based UI contributions only on the salary used for social insurance.

Vietnam’s New Capital Gains Tax Rules For Foreign Enterprises

On 14 June 2025, the National Assembly passed the amended Corporate Income Tax Law 2025 (CIT Law 2025). Among other things, this legislation is expected to bring significant changes in determining the method of calculating tax for capital transfer and securities transfer transactions (Capital Gains Tax) undertaken by foreign companies. This post aims to provide a comprehensive and clear overview by analyzing and comparing these new regulations with those stipulated in the Corporate Income Tax Law 2008 (CIT Law 2008).

1)         Definition of Taxable Income Arising in Vietnam for Foreign Companies

A key area of adjustment in the CIT Law 2025 relates to the definition of taxable income arising in Vietnam for foreign companies, making it more transparent.

Under the CIT Law 2008, the specific definition of such income was not explicitly clarified within the law itself; rather, it was detailed in Decree 218/2013 guiding the CIT Law 2008. In contrast, the CIT Law 2025 has directly incorporated this definition, clearly stating that taxable income arising in Vietnam for foreign companies is income originating from Vietnam, irrespective of the location where business activities are conducted.

Some Drawbacks of Resolution 222 on Vietnam’s International Financial Center

On 27 June 2025, as a foundational step for establishing an international financial hub in Vietnam, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopts the Resolution 222 on the International Financial Center (IFC) in Vietnam (specifically in Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang City) (Resolution 222). However, when compared to international best practices, the Resolution reveals several weaknesses that may deter international investors.

Based on a comparative analysis, here are the main drawbacks:

  • Isolation from Vietnam domestic markets – Perhaps the most important benefits of investing in an IFC in Vietnam is the opportunity to access Vietnam domestic capital and financial market. Unfortunately, Resolution 222 does not clearly contemplate how an IFC member can invest or interact with Vietnam domestic capital and financial market. Without a better access to Vietnamese domestic markets, investors from regional financial centers may have less incentives to move to the IFC in Vietnam.

  • Unstable and unpredictable legal framework: Resolution 222 took effect from 1 September 2025. After five years, the legal framework contemplated by Resolution 222 will be reviewed by the National Assembly and may be replaced by a Law on International Financial Center. Existing projects can continue to operate under “existing” legal frameworks at such time. Given the amount of implementing legislation and the infrastructure required, it may take one to two years for the IFC to be up and running. Accordingly, investors may only have around three to four years to actually run theirs businesses before a potential new law will be issued. During the operation of the IFC, a regulation can be issued to limit the rights of IFC members to ensure “national interests” and “prevent threats against national security”. This provision is very broad and vague and could allow IFC regulators to change their regulations at any time.

Key Updates And Revisions To Vietnam's Enterprise Registration Procedures Under Decree 168/2025

The Vietnamese Government has recently issued Decree 168/2025 on enterprise registration, which replaces the previous Decree 1/2021. This blog post highlights several significant changes and clarifications to enterprise registration procedures under Decree 168/2025.

1)         Additional forms of documents evidencing the completion of capital contribution and transfer

Decree 168/2025 introduces new options for documenting the completion of capital contributions or capital transfers in the enterprise registration application dossiers as follows:

For evidence of the completion of a transfer, one of the following documents is now accepted:

•          A copy or extract of the member register or shareholder register.

•          A copy or original of the liquidation minutes of the transfer contract.

•          Bank confirmation of completed payment.

•          Other documents validly proving the completion of share or capital contribution transfer as prescribed by law.

Private Corporate Bonds: Ambiguity concerning the permissible use of bond proceeds

Decree 153/2020 (as amended), which governs private corporate bond offerings, creates ambiguity concerning the permissible use of bond proceeds, especially when parent companies aim to finance their subsidiaries.

Decree 153/2020 stipulates that bond proceeds can be used for implementing investment programmes and projects, restructuring debts of the issuing enterprise itself, or for other purposes sanctioned by specialised laws. The ambiguity stems specifically from how the qualifier “of the issuing enterprise itself” applies to these permissible uses. This leads to two primary interpretations:

Key Changes to the Investment Law 2020

The recently enacted law amending the Investment Law 2020 (Amendment Law 2025), effective 1 July 2025, introduces the following key changes:

1.           Major Decentralization of Approval Authority

1.1.       Under the Amendment Law 2025, the Provincial People's Committees, rather than the Prime Minister under the previous law, have the authority to grant investment policy approval for the following projects:

Law on Management of State Capital 2025 – A Change in Direction

A pdf version of this post can be downloaded here.

In June 2025, the National Assembly passed a new Law on Management of State Capital (Law on State Capital 2025) replacing the same law issued in 2014 and amended in 2018 (Law on State Capital 2014). The Law on State Capital 2025 have given the individuals managing State-owned (or controlled) enterprises (i.e., the Members’ Council or the Chairman) substantial flexibility to run their businesses. In this post, we discussed some key changes introduced by the Law on State Capital 2025. A comparison between the Law on State Capital 2025 and Law on State Capital 2014 by Deep Research of Gemini 2.5 Pro can be found here.

Clearer scope of application

Law on State Capital 2025 clearly provides that enterprises which more than 50% charter capital or voting shares of which is held by the State are also subject to this law. This point is not clear under the Law on State Capital 2014.

Definition of State Capital

Under Law on State Capital 2025, State capital in a State-owned enterprise only includes the contributed capital portion held by the State out of the total owner's equity of the enterprise. In addition, the Law on State Capital 2025 defines State capital by reference to the holding percentage of the State. This new approach is a significant change from the Law on State Capital 2014 because:

  • The Law on State Capital 2025 excludes other funding sources such as the state budget, public assets, and development investment funds from the definition of "State capital" within an enterprise. Instead, the Law on State Capital 2025 classifies these as sources of capital and assets to be used for investing state capital in enterprises; and

  • in many scenarios, the holding percentage is more important than the absolute amount

A Question of Due Process: The Untimely Publication of Vietnam's New Laws Introduction

The 9th working session of the National Assembly of Vietnam, which lasted 35 days and ends on 27 June 2025, is probably the most productive working session of the National Assembly for several decades. In this one working session, the National Assembly has passed a number of laws equal to all laws passed by the National Assembly in 17 previous working sessions.  

Immediately after the conclusion of the National Assembly’s working sessions in late June 2025, newspapers and social media in Vietnam were flooded with information about these new laws and regulations. Information about these new laws was important since many of those laws would take effect on 1 July 2025 – only one week after the National Assembly concluded its working session.

As part of our marketing efforts, we also set out to review those laws and resolutions for our legal updates. However, when we first started, our lawyers struggled to locate the final text of many of these laws. For us, a “final text” of a law would be a scanned PDF of these laws bearing the seal of the National Assembly and signatures of the Chairman of the National Assembly or an official publication on official websites such as the Official Gazette or the National Database of Legal Documents.

Legal Challenges Arising from Vietnam's Administrative Reorganization

Introduction

From 1 July 2025, Vietnam’s local Government system formally operates according to a new “two-tier” system in 34 provinces as opposed to the old “three-tier” system in 63 provinces. In the new system, there are only two levels of local Government including provinces (tỉnh) and wards (xã, phường). Government agencies at district level no longer exist. Vietnam also combines several existing wards to form a larger ward. As a result, we estimate that Vietnam now has about 3,300 local people’s committees down from 10,000 local people’s committees.    

To achieve this, by 1 July 2025, the National Assembly and the Government have, among other things, amended the Constitution, amended the Law on Organisation of Local Government, issued 34 resolutions and 28 Decrees to restructure the local government system. Unfortunately, despite such herculean efforts, it appears that the new regulations have not addressed adequately various legal issues arising from the restructuring. In this post we will discuss some of these issues. More information can be found from the attached research generated by the latest AI LLM from Google (Gemini Pro 2.5).

No clear geographical boundaries between various local authorities at wards levels.  

It appears that on 1 July 2025, the Government did not establish clear geographical boundaries between the newly established wards. This is because the Standing Committee of the National Assembly sets a deadline of 30 September 2025 for the Government to do so for each province. Until a source of truth of the geographical boundaries at wards level is set up, many companies and individuals may not know for sure the correct addresses that they may use in their operations including application submitted to the authorities, invoices issued to clients, or contracts.

Overhaul To Vietnam Court System From 1 July 2025

In 2024, the National Assembly of Vietnam enacted the new Law on Organization of the People’s Court (Law on Courts), which implemented significant reforms to the structure of the People’s Court system in comparison to the 2014 Law on Courts. Shortly after the promulgation of the 2024 Law on Courts, Vietnam initiated a substantial reorganisation of its administrative divisions, transitioning from a three-tier (province, district, commune) model to a two-tier (province, commune) model. Consequently, in 2025, the National Assembly approved an amendment to the 2024 Law on Courts to align the court system with the updated two-tier administrative division model (2024-2025 Law on Courts). Below are our discussions on the key changes under the 2024-2025 Law on Courts when compared to the 2014 Law on Courts.

1)           Complete Restructuring of the Court Hierarchy

The court system is majorly reformed with the removal of the High People's Courts (Tòa án nhân dân cấp cao) and replacement of District Courts with Regional Court (Tòa án nhân dân khu vực).

 

Info
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In ,

Default rules on Board members nomination

Article 29.3 of Decree 102/2010 provides that unless otherwise provided by the charter or by the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) of a joint stock company, a shareholder or a group of shareholders will have the right to nominate candidates for a Board Member as follows:

Shareholding

Number of candidates

10% to less than 20%

1

20% to less than 30%

2

30% to less than 40%

3

40% to less than 50%

4

50% to less than 60%

5

60% to less than 70%

6

70% to less than 80%

7

80% to less than 90%

8

 

Therefore, if the shareholders of a joint stock company intend to structure the Board of such company according to their own agreement, the Charter of such joint stock company should be revised to reflect the allocation of Board members agreed by the shareholders and to exclude the default application of Article 29.3 of Decree 102/2010.

Info
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In